Political
Science 499
Senior
Seminar
The
senior seminar paper is designed as a capstone of your learning experience at
Instructor: William Lee Jackson
Office Hours:
Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday
SMC FTL 253.964.4688
Emial:
wjackson@stmartin.edu
Assignments:
You will complete three preliminary assignments. The instructor will meet individually with
each student as requested to review and discuss these assignments. The final paper is due on or before May 10,
2008. If you wish to have your paper “marked up”
and returned, you must give me a copy for that purpose.
Topic statement due March 23, 2008.
Introduction
due March 30, 2008.
Outline
due April 13, 2008.
Final paper due May 10, 2008.
Grades:
The
grade will be based primarily upon the quality of your finished paper. Consideration will be given to the
understanding of political science your have demonstrated during the completion
and discussion of your preliminary assignments.
Good luck and enjoy the learning.
Assignments: Working at the extension creates two problems
for you. One is that the terms are
shorter than normal. That means you must
work hard for your regular classes. But
when it comes to research, hard work does not always make up for time. You simply do not have time to wait around to
get rare materials on interlibrary loan.
Nor do you have a lot of time to go back and gather up material you
forgot or to investigate questions you missed the first time around. The second problem is that available research
materials are much less that ideal. We
try to compensate for both problems with careful planning.
The topic statement
is a brief exploration of the topic to determine whether it is doable
within the confines of this class. It is
not included in the final paper. It is a
simple first step but an important one.
You must make sure the topic you have chosen is appropriate to the class
and that you can find the material needed to do it before you get too far down
the road on your research. The topic
statement should answer two questions.
1. What broad topic do you wish
to investigate? Decided on a topic about
which you wish to learn and begin a literature search. 2. Is
there enough background information available for your research? Others have contributed to your field
historically, philosophically, or experimentally. Prepare a bibliography, which lists the
material, which is abatable to you. It
is important that you have access to the material now or are sure that you can
lay your hands on it when you need it.
List only those sources, which are really at, hand at this point. If there is not enough you should quickly
find a new topic.
The introduction sets
the topic of the paper in the context of the times by explaining why the topic
is important and showing which unanswered aspect of the topic you will
explore. Now that you know you have
enough information for your paper, it is time to focus your research. Review the material you have gathered. After reviewing the literature, prepare a
draft of your introduction that should basically answer two questions. Why is this question of significance? Why is it an appropriate subject for this
paper at this time?
The outline helps
a writer achieve a firm grasp of organization.
A good outline, reworked and reorganized repeatedly as the paper
progresses, resembles an architect’s preliminary sketches rather than his
finished blueprints. An outline helps
the writer visualize and strengthen tentative connections. It serves as a guide in cutting sentences and
paragraphs that turn out to be irrelevant.
It also provides a vehicle for the class and the instructor to help you in
the preparation of your research and paper.
The paper must
be written to conform to some style handbook.
Among the acceptable choices are those by Kate Turabian and the Modern
Language Association (MLA). Strunk and
White’s Elements of Style is a brief
classic of good writing and is strongly recommended.
While the
organization of the paper is a product of both style and subject, each should
contain the following elements:
Introduction - which explains the
issue you have decided
to investigate and briefly
explains the importance
of the issue.
Background - which provides a brief history of the
attempts
which
have been made to cope with the problem by the
solutions
which have been attempted and explains
the
current
status of public policy on the issue.
Policy Analysis - which explains the flaws in our
current
public
policy position, discusses the process by which
the
issue has once again moved onto the political agenda,
presents
the alternatives under discussion in the
contemporary
debate. It also presents and defends
the
best policy solution to the issue.
Prediction - which analyzes the
political forces at work in the
contemporary
debate, explains their interplay, predicts
and
defends the most likely course for dealing with the
issue.
Sources Consulted - which lists the
material you have consulted
for
general or specific information during the course of
your
research.
Since
this is an academic paper of the highest quality, you must pay particular attention
to sourcing. You must give credit to
those from whom you have borrowed ideas, concepts, and data. You must because other scholars may need to
verify your work at some time in the future and you must because presenting the
work of others as your own is the highest form of academic dishonesty and is
subject to the highest form of academic discipline when discovered. You must adopt a consistent pattern of
citation for giving credit to the sources of your facts and ideas. I prefer “parenthetical citations and works
consulted.”
|
Grading Rubric for Senior Paper Political Science 499 |
|||||
|
Factor
|
Poor 1- 3 |
Fair 4 - 6 |
Good 7 - 9 |
Excellent 10 |
Score |
|
Introduction |
Something to fill the space |
Helps me to understand why you are writing this paper |
Shows me clearly what your purpose is and what you plan to achieve |
Leaves me breathlessly eager to read the paper |
|
|
Issue Definition |
Mentions the issue and its importance |
Clearly defines the issue or its importance |
Clearly defines the issue and its importance |
Definition of the issue in precise and measurable terms
|
|
|
Background History |
Quick run through of some important elements |
Presentation of all of the important elements |
Explanation of the important elements |
Polished and complete summary of the history
|
|
|
Background Evaluation |
Simple statement of the success of current policy |
Statement with brief explanation of success |
Statement with full and careful explanation of success |
Well analyzed and empirically supported analysis of success
|
|
|
Background Status |
Simple statement of the status of current policy |
Statement with brief explanation of status |
Statement with full and careful explanation of status |
Well analyzed and empirically supported analysis of status
|
|
|
Policy Analysis Flaws |
Simple statement of the flaws in the current system |
Statement with brief explanation of flaws |
Statement with full and careful explanation of flaws
|
Well analyzed and empirically supported analysis of flaws |
|
|
Policy Analysis Agenda |
Simple statement of the agenda development |
Statement with brief explanation of agenda development |
Statement with full and careful explanation of agenda development
|
Well analyzed and empirically supported analysis of agenda development
|
|
|
Policy Analysis Best Policy |
Simple statement of the best policy solution |
Statement with brief explanation of the best policy |
Statement with full and careful explanation of the best policy
|
Well analyzed and empirically supported analysis of the best policy
|
|
|
Prediction |
Simple statement of the most likely outcome |
Statement with brief explanation of most likely outcome |
Statement with full and careful explanation of most likely outcome
|
Well analyzed and empirically supported analysis of most likely outcome |
|
|
Sources |
Enough sources are listed |
Listed in consistent style |
Source list is neat in correct |
The source page beautiful |
|