This section is about what to
write. If you want to know why or how go to the section
on learning. This section is about the how the content of your
writing is converted into a final grade. Grades will always be based upon
how well you demonstrate to the instructor that you understand the
material. You will be able to demonstrate your understanding in a variety
of ways. The pages below discuss the general and specific requirements.
First some general
comments about grades and how they are earned.
Check here for Understanding Grades.
Second there are many
kinds of writing assignments.
Some of your favorites
are explained here. Check here for Writing choices.
Check here for a list of
the Symbols and marks I use when marking up your drafts.
Finally, some ideas on
the Form the paper should take. Thanks to Dr.
Edward M Hanlon at
Grading
performance constitutes a complex and difficult process. While human beings cannot be pigeonholed,
they can be judged on the basis of their achievement, not effort alone. These descriptions attempt to explain why
different students obtain different results.
The "A" Student -- An Excellent Student
A students have virtually perfect attendance. Their commitment to the class resembles that
of the teacher. They are prepared for
class. They always read the
assignment. Their attention to detail is
such that they occasionally catch the teacher in a mistake. They show interest in the class and in the
subject. They look up or dig out what
they don't understand. They often ask
interesting questions or make thoughtful comments. They have retentive minds. They are able to connect past learning with
the present. They bring a background
with them to class. They have winning
attitudes. They have both the
determination and the self-discipline necessary for success. They show initiative. They do things they have not been told to do.
They have something special. It may be
exceptional intelligence and insight. It
may be unusual creativity, organizational skills, commitment -- or a
combination thereof. These gifts are
evident to the teacher and to the other students as well. Their work is a pleasure to grade.
The
"B" Student -- The Good Student
B
students attend class regularly, but occasionally find good reasons not to be there. They are prepared for class. They always read the assignment, but not
always before the class in which it is due.
They show interest in the class and in the subject. They ask questions about the things they
don't understand. Their comments are interesting
but occasionally not on the mark for the subject under discussion. They have good attitudes. They have a good measure of self-discipline. They do the things, which have been assigned
and suggested for improvement. They have
either special gifts, which they do not always discipline themselves to use, or
they have exceptional determination and discipline, which allows them to make
very good use of their more limited talent.
The
"C" Student -- An Average or Typical Student
C
students miss class frequently. They put
other priorities ahead of academic work.
They prepare their assignments consistently but in a perfunctory
manner. Their work may be sloppy or
careless. At times, it is incomplete or
late. They are not visibly committed to
the class. They participate without
enthusiasm. Their body language often
expresses boredom. They vary enormously
in talent. Some have exceptional ability
but show undeniable signs of poor self-management or bad attitudes. Others are diligent but simply average in
academic ability. They obtain mediocre
or inconsistent results on tests. They have some concept of what is going on
but clearly have not mastered the material.
---------------
Source: John H. Williams,
C. Symbols
E. Top
Commentary
A commentary is a written work with a narrow scope specifically related to the general
topic. It includes material drawn from at least two outside sources. Your purpose is to demonstrate understanding
of one topic by completing a 750 word essay which reports on some aspect of the
topic in greater detail than the text.
The commentary provides you with the opportunity to do outside research on some
particular aspect of the topic, which is interesting to you. It also provides
you with the opportunity to do research which might later be useful for your
senior paper. Commentaries must do two things. First, they say something about
the specific subject. Second, they must explain how that specific subject is an
important piece of the topic. Your commentary must analyze your subject in
relation to our topic. It must provide additional information on some aspect of
the topic and it must relate that specific information to the topic. Review the
topic and select one area, which interests you enough to do additional
research. Complete your research. Then write a summary of that research in a
well-constructed essay. This makes your thesis particularly important. It must
demonstrate the relevance of the commentary subject to the class topic and
guides the construction of the commentary.
Your commentary should begin with a strong introduction, which places your
subject within the context of the class subject and the particular
topic. It is followed with a brief summary of the new information you have
developed for the commentary.
The final portion of the commentary is your analysis, which explains what the
subject of your commentary contributes to our knowledge of the class subject
and the topic of the week. It explains the importance and the contribution of
your commentary to the broader issues we have been investigating in class. It
is the most important part of your commentary and the part, which is hardest to
prepare. It is also where you demonstrate your understanding of the subject.
Standards
Is the assignment on time? Yes
No
Is the assignment completed in the proper form? Yes No
Does it identify the clear and coherent thesis? Yes No
Is it well-organized (outlined)? Yes No
Does the thesis demonstrate the relevance of the subject to the
class topic? Yes No
Does it contain an effective brief summary of the new information?
Yes No
Does it explain how that specific subject is an important piece of
the topic? Yes No
Does the commentary analyze your subject in relation to our topic?
Yes No
Does it have few errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling?
Yes No
Does it demonstrate mastery of the material covered? Yes No
Are the sources properly cited? Yes No
Is it well written? Yes No
C. Symbols
E. Top
Essays
Essays (c. 750 words)
are analytic or interpretative compositions dealing with subjects from a
limited point of view. Essays consist of specific essay questions, which I
select to allow you to demonstrate your knowledge of one class topic. They give
you the opportunity to develop your cognitive skills in the area where they
will be most in demand in the real world. That is to analyze a problem or
question, reach a conclusion and defend it with appropriate evidence and
argument. The questions will be designed to get you to take a position and
defend it with reasoned analysis. They are seldom questions with correct
answers. Rather they are subjects of debate and decision. The point is to take
a view and defend it. My goal is to help you learn to think through the problem
and learn to better express your thinking. This is not an opinion but an
analysis based upon the evidence.
Your
job is to answer the question by analyzing the general knowledge you have
acquired and apply it to the defense of your answer with a well-reasoned essay.
Essays are not definitive treatments of the subject but your reflected analysis
of the assigned readings, your outside readings and our classroom work. To do
that you should first put the problem in its proper context. This is done
through an introduction, which relates the specific, question to the topic and
shows me that you have some understanding of the topic beyond the narrow scope
of the question. Then you should express your view, or reach your decision that
is explained in your thesis statement. Now you must defend your thesis with
facts and ideas that have been presented in the text, discussions, videos and
outside sources. You should be able to make a least four points to defend your
thesis if I have done a good job with the question. Simply stating these points
is not enough. You must develop each of those points with evidence from the
material to show that you understand the material.
Standards
Is the assignment on time? Yes No
Is the assignment completed in the proper
form? Yes No
Does it present a clear and coherent
thesis? Yes No
Is it well-organized (outlined)? Yes No
Does it cover the main points? Yes No
Are the points adequately explained and
defended? Yes No
Is the evidence adequate and factually
correct? Yes No
Are important counter-arguments refuted?
Yes No
Does it have few errors in sentence
structure, grammar and spelling? Yes
No
Does it demonstrate mastery of the
material covered? Yes No
Are the sources properly cited? Yes No
Is it well written? Yes No
C. Symbols
E. Top
Outline
The
topic outline is useful for quick reference. It presents, in logical order, the
topics and subtopics that a paper covers. A thesis statement summarizing the
central idea of the paper precedes it. It then presents the major points raised
in the reading in outline form. The outline consists of headings for the major
points developed, subheads for the points developed in support to the major
points and sub subheads for the examples and data cited.
Your
instructor believes that outlining a very valuable tool in both learning and
writing that too few students use effectively. Preparing an outline of the
reading helps you to visualize the relationship among ideas and examples used
by the author. It helps you to better understand those relationships. It is
also a good way of reviewing the material and creates a good study guide. Of
equal importance, practice in outlining and summarizing helps a student achieve
a firm grasp of organization. This will help the student in preparing outlines
for their own papers and essays.
Read
the material as you normally do. Then jot down the major themes, which were
developed in the reading. Now go back through the reading and prepare an
outline as you read through the material again. Make sure that the outline
covers the subject that it treats and everything promised in the title. An
adequate outline is a kind of process of thinking through the reading. Make
sure that the parts of the outline are logically arranged. If the outline is
disorganized and ineffective, your have probably missed something important. I
seldom assign readings, which are disorganized and ineffective. Doing it
correctly you will develop a good understanding of the material. As you outline
you should concentrate on the value of the outline as both a tool for learning
and a writing tool.
Standards
Is the assignment on time? Yes No
Is the assignment completed in the proper
form? Yes No
Does it identify the clear and coherent
thesis? Yes No
Is it well-organized? Yes No
Does it present the major points raised in
the reading in outline form? Yes No
Are the subheads for the points developed
in support to the major points? Yes
No
Are sub subheads for the examples and data
cited developed? Yes No
Is it a good way of reviewing the
material? Yes No
Does it have few errors in sentence
structure, grammar and spelling? Yes
No
Does it demonstrate mastery of the
material covered? Yes No
Are the sources properly cited? Yes No
Is it well written? Yes No
C. Symbols
E. Top
Précis
A précis is a 750 word essay appreciation of an academic article which
demonstrates your understanding of one topic. Only articles from academic
journals can be reviewed. Academic journals are those thick ones with long
articles with lots of footnotes. They are not Time, Newsweek or even Atlantic Monthly. If you have any doubt
about the journal clear it with me before you begin.
Your précis should include correct bibliographic information, a summary of the
book's research methods and findings and an explanation of what the work adds
to our understanding of the topic.
There are three objectives of this assignment:
1.
To broaden your understanding of the topic.
2.
To develop familiarity with the process of academic research.
3.
To improve our understanding of how good academic writing is organized and
presented.
The précis should be written like other essays with a strong introduction and
clear thesis. In this case your thesis is ideally a one sentence evaluation of
the work. It is followed by a number of paragraphs which develop and support
that evaluation. You should summarize the main points of the book and
demonstrate that you understand both the book and the topic.
The précis should end with a substantial conclusion which explains what the
work adds to our understanding of the topic. Thus it is more than a book report
and less than a term paper.
Standards
Is the assignment on time? Yes No
Is the assignment completed in the proper
form? Yes No
Does it identify the clear and coherent
thesis? Yes No
Is it well-organized (outlined)? Yes No
Is the article from an appropriate
academic journal? Yes No
Does it demonstrate a good understanding
of the article? Yes No
Does it explain what the article teaches
us about the topic? Yes No
Does it have a strong introduction?
Yes No
Does it have few errors in sentence
structure, grammar and spelling? Yes
No
Does it demonstrate mastery of the
material covered? Yes No
Are the sources properly cited? Yes No
Is it well written? Yes No
C. Symbols
E. Top
Presentations
There are several reasons why I use
student presentations as a teaching/learning tool.
First, it often helps break up
long class sessions. While I can easily talk for two and a half or even five
hours about these interesting topics, students often have trouble listening to
me for that length of time. Student presentations give us the opportunity to
listen to someone else. Second, it is a good way for the class to review the
material. A presentation by fellow students often encourages you to think
through the material in a different way than a presentation by the instructor.
Third, it is sometimes a good check for me to see what aspects of the material
students find most interesting or important. Fourth, student presentations
allow you to focus in on those aspects of the topic you find most interesting
rather than those which I find compelling. Fifth, presentations give you the
opportunity to practice and develop different cognitive skills than normal. You
are required to organize the presentation and discuss it with your peers in a
controlled setting.
Presentations
are reviews by students of one of the chapters of the reading assignment. They
are scheduled in advance with the instructor. There is a short form for those
who wish to schedule a presentation. Students complete the form and give it to
me I will review and return it with my approval. When we reach the appropriate
place in the class, I will turn the class over to the student. The student will
conduct a review of that reading in about 30 minutes with time for questions.
You may use power point, lecture notes and outlines, discussion (Socratic or
otherwise) or even where appropriate a game format. You may provide handouts or
outlines for the class.
Standards
Is the assignment on time? Yes No
Is the assignment completed in the proper
form? Yes No
Does it identify the clear and coherent
thesis? Yes No
Is it well-organized (outlined)? Yes No
Did it review appropriate material from
the text? Yes No
Was it given to the class rather than the
instructor? Yes No
Did it stimulate questions and discussion?
Yes No
Did the presenter attempt to convey
knowledge? Yes No
Does it have few errors in sentence
structure, grammar and spelling? Yes
No
Does it demonstrate mastery of the
material covered? Yes No
Are the sources properly cited? Yes No
Was the material explained rather than
read? Yes No
C. Symbols
E. Top
Take Home
The purpose
of the take home exam is to give you the opportunity to demonstrate your
understanding of the material covered in the topic. It is designed to test your
understanding of the reading assigned. It is not designed to test your ability
to do rapid internet research. Each of the elements has a specific goal in
helping you improve your cognitive skills.
Identification
questions ask you to write a brief paragraph which demonstrates that you
understand the importance of the item within the context of the topic. No
outside research is required, nor will it help. The text or class discussion
covered this point. The question is “Do you know who, what, where, when, and
why it matters in the context of this topic?”
Brief essays
are narrow in focus and primarily ask you to briefly explain something that was
more thoroughly covered in the reading or class. They are about 500 words and
direct. They require neither elaborate development nor research. Your job is simply
to answer the question directly and accurately in your own words. Doing so
effectively demonstrates that you understand the basic facts involved. They are
designed to test your understanding of the material by requiring you to
demonstrate it by writing and effective description.
Standards
Is the assignment on time? Yes
No
Is the assignment completed in the proper form? Yes No
Does the first identification show who, what, where, when and
historical significance? Yes No
Does the second identification show who, what, where, when and
historical significance? Yes No
Does the third identification show who, what, where, when and
historical significance? Yes No
Does the fourth identification show who, what, where, when and
historical significance? Yes No
Does the fifth identification show who, what, where, when and
historical significance? Yes No
Does the essay answer the question that was asked? Yes No
Does it have few errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling?
Yes No
Does it demonstrate mastery of the material covered? Yes No
Are the sources properly cited? Yes No
Is it well written? Yes No
C. Symbols
E. Top
Treatise
A treatise is a synthetic composition covering the topic under discussion. It
demonstrates your understanding of one topic by completing an essay of 750
words, which summarizes the required materials effectively. It is your written
answer to the question "What is the major theme of this topic?"
The treatise is your reflected blending of the assigned readings and our
classroom work. It presents them in a well-organized manner, which clearly reflects
your understanding and analysis of the material. You must organize and present
the material in your own words to demonstrate that you truly understand.
The treatise is not a summary of everything that you have learned about the
topic. Rather it is a well-written and defended analysis of what you find to be
the major theme of the topic. Your first challenge is to think through the
material and define its major theme. This then becomes the thesis of your
treatise. This is not always an easy task, but it is what makes the treatise a
valuable learning tool. Since it is the major theme, it must touch on most of
the material, but it need not explain everything.
Then you must isolate four or five important points, which support your thesis.
These points should be balanced throughout the material so that you can
demonstrate the breadth of your understanding of the topic when you explain
them. Even with careful selection of your points, there will be important
portions of the material, which do not fit. You can of course ignore them or
you can prepare an excellent introduction, which briefly puts those elements in
place. Such an introduction is more that just a way to start the treatise and
takes more time and space to develop than a sentence or two, but it is always
worth the effort. Be sure to develop each of your points so that they support
your thesis and show me that you understand them.
Standards
Is the assignment on time? Yes No
Is the assignment completed in the proper
form? Yes No
Does it present a clear and coherent
thesis? Yes No
Is it well-organized (outlined)? Yes No
Is the first argument in support clear and
supported by evidence and/or plausible example?
Is the second argument clear and supported
by evidence and/or plausible example?
Is the third argument clear and supported
by evidence and/or plausible example?
Is the fourth argument clear and supported
by evidence and/or plausible example?
Does it have few errors in sentence
structure, grammar and spelling? Yes No
Does it demonstrate mastery of the
material covered? Yes No
Are the sources properly cited? Yes No
Is it well written? Yes No
C. Symbols
E. Top
C. Symbols
The following symbols will be used to mark your drafts:
A = This pronoun does not have a clear antecedent,
number is wrong or the reference is vague.
D = Direct and active sentences are much easier
to understand than passive and indirect ones.
N = The number of your nouns and verbs do not
agree with one another, one is plural and the
other is singular.
P = You meant this to be possessive but did not
spell it right or you made it possessive when
you should not have done.
R = Redundancy - you just said that, do not say it
again. Once is enough.
S = Spelling, you spelled this incorrectly or spelled
the wrong word.
U = Too many unclear pronouns in this sentence.
II = Things listed in a series must take the same
form.
W. C. = This isn’t exactly wrong but I think there
is a better "word choice” to say what you
mean.
NAS = This pretends to be, but is not a sentence.
It has no subject or it has no action.
C. Symbols
E. Top
D. Form and Style
Dr. Edward M Hanlon at the John Jay link in my resources section has a History Stylesheet from which I borrowed much of what follows. It is much more complete and highly recommended. For papers, historians prefer the style outlined in Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, 6th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996). Others use the APA style. Either is acceptable to me.
Typing and Presentation
Plagiarism will not be tolerated.
Plagiarism is the act of using the words and ideas of
others without giving proper credit. Common varieties
of plagiarism include: a. having another individual
write a paper or take an examination for a student;
b. directly quoting material without using quotations
marks or proper indentation; c. not giving credit for
another person's original ideas and organization.
Plagiarism and cheating are considered unethical
actions and a violation of academic policy. (SMC p.29)
Long quotations should be indented five spaces.
Sources must be listed and appropriate credit given.
I prefer parenthetical citations and sources consulted.
I will gladly review your drafts. I will not proofread them. When it
becomes obvious that you have not "proofed" the paper I will stop
making "English" corrections.
Drafts are double spaced with a right hand margin of at least two inches
so that I have room to comment. They will be reviewed and
returned (usually by the next class session) for both content and
"English". Papers are graded upon how well they demonstrate an
understanding of the material. Correcting the "English" errors will
not improve your grade.
Papers must be typed, single-spaced, on standard 8 1/2"x 11" paper.
Use 1 inch margins all around.
Use no smaller than 12 pt. type. 14 pt is highly preferred.
Do not use right-hand justification as it leads to oddly spaced words.
Do not use erasable paper.
Staple the paper in the top left-hand corner.
Do not use plastic covers or binders.
Keep a copy other than the one you submit.
There should be two spaces after a period.
The paper should be written in paragraphs.
The first line of each paragraph should be indented five spaces (one standard tab).
Sub-headings may be used, but are not considered good style by some.
There is no gap between paragraphs.
All pages should be numbered.
The following information should be included on the upper right corner of the front page.
· Your name
· The course name and number
· The professor's name
· The date the paper was due
· The title of the paper
Final papers are normally graded without comment, correction, or return.
If you wish me to mark up and comment on your final papers,
give me a stamped self-addressed envelope.
Good grammar is expected.
Those new to writing papers should pay special attention to the following, lack of attention to which represents 90% of grammatical and stylistic errors seen in student papers:
Spelling should follow the generally accepted conventions. If you do not have one, buy a good dictionary.
Use the correct tense. In general refer to actions people did in the past in the past tense (examples: "Napoleon won the Battle of Austerlitz", and "Voltaire wrote Candide"). Refer to quotations from authors in the present tense, even if the author you are referring to is a historical person (examples: "E.P. Thompson [a modern writer] says that the English working class evolved only in the 19th century," and also "Voltaire [an 18th Century author] suggests the Church of his time was corrupt.") In the last case note that you use the present tense for what Voltaire says/writes/suggests but the past tense for his description of a state of affairs in the past.
Apostrophes are not used in the plurals of words (example: "telephones." not "telephone's.") Apostrophes are used to indicate possession of one thing by another (example "the man's hat.") If the word that possesses is already plural the apostrophe goes after the "s" that was added to make the word plural (for instance, "The Students' Association" means the association belonging to many students, but "the student's association" would mean some association pertaining to one particular student.)
"Its" = indication of possession, like "his" or "her." e.g. "the book's cover" = "its cover."
"It's"= contraction for "it is."
Capitalize:
The first word in a sentence.
Proper nouns (i.e. names).
Words such as "King," "President," only when referring to a particular person.
Words in titles, but not non-initial conjunctions, prepositions, or articles.
Conditional Verbs I
"He would have been elected," not "He would of been elected."
"She could have done it," not "She could of done it."
Conditional Verbs II
It has been very common to use phrases such as "If he would have helped her, she would now be safe," but this is grammatical nonsense and does not do what it intends, which is to make a conditional statement about the past. Literally the phrase as it stands means "If he had wanted to help her, she would now be safe." The phrase should be "If he had helped her, she would now be safe."
Split Infinitives
The infinitive of a verb is that part which expresses the meaning alone, for example, "to go," "to sing," "to be." It has long been considered bad style in English to "split infinitives" with adverbs. Instead of writing "to quickly go," or "to finally sing," you should write "to go quickly," or "finally to sing."
Use of First Person Pronouns
When writing formal papers only use "I" and "me" when it becomes confusing to avoid them. A term paper is not meant to "sound" like a letter to a friend or a diary entry.
"Feel" and "Believe"
These words are massively overused by students. Your feelings are not relevant to a paper, it is your thoughts that count. When writing about historical figures, you only know what they "felt" if they left diaries or told someone else their feelings. Unless you can cite such information, do not state that a historical figure "felt" something. Also do not use "felt" when you mean "thought." These comments apply to "believe" in a less stringent manner.
"Being that"
"Being that he was King of France, ...." is better stated "Since he was..,." or "Because he was...," or "When he was..."
Words to Avoid
"Incredible," "Unbelievable," "Literally," "People," "They." Always check that these words really mean something when you use them.
Passive Constructions
It is bad style to use passive constructions, or more concretely, passive constructions lead to bad style.
Here are some examples:-
"The
King was lynched."
"The White House had been burned down."
All these sentences would be stronger and more informative if the person doing the lynching/burning/discovering was put in the picture.
"The
Parisian mob lynched the King."
"The British burned down the White House."
C. Symbols
E. Top
Citations and Notes
You must indicate from where you are making any quotations you use in your paper. It is also important to cite the source of arguments and ideas when you take them from a textbook or other author. The way to do this is in citations footnotes (at the bottom of the page) or endnotes (at then end of the paper) or, although it is not yet the standard in History, I much prefer the parenthetical references system explained below.
Avoid quotations and paraphrases of the modern authors you consult. Sources from the period you are writing about may be quoted, but do this sparingly. It is YOUR words and thoughts that are required, and on which you will be graded.
My preferred system of citation is the parenthetical references system used in some fields of academic study. It is not used in history, but you may wish to investigate it for other classes. APA Style. When using a direct quote, write the author and date in parentheses, following the quote: (Author's last name, page number) Example: According to Christopher Haigh, "Henry VIII died a Catholic, though rather a bad Catholic" (Haigh, 1984, 207). (Note: you will write out the book in full at the end of the paper, in your "References," or bibliography, section).
If you do not directly quote, but you mention the author's name, follow the name with a date (of the book's publication) in parentheses. Example: Susan Reynolds (1994) would like to dispel with the idea of feudalism altogether.
If you do not quote from the authors or mention their names in the sentence,
and if you still borrow their arguments or ideas, cite their names and the
dates of their works in parentheses at the end. Example: Atheism was
unknown to
If you insist or you computer is set up to footnote. Go ahead. Notes should be indicated in the text by superscipted numbers, like this - 1. If your equipment cannot superscript, enclose footnote numbers in brackets like this - [1]. Notes should be numbered consecutively from the beginning to the end of the paper rather than being separately numbered on each page. Footnotes should be single spaced. Leave a line between each footnote. The first line of a footnote should be indented five spaces.
The first mention of a source in the footnote or endnote should contain the following information in the order given here:- Author, Title, Publisher, Date
Note especially the use of punctuation in these references. Note also that the
place of publication is always a city, never a state or country. If the place
of publication is not one of the major publishing centers [i.e.,
Bibliography
For a college paper your bibliography or booklist should list all the books and articles you have consulted in writing your paper. It should contain the same information as your first citation in a footnote but in a slightly different order. For example:-
Single-author book:
Alverez, A. (1970). The Savage God: A Study of Suicide. New York: Random House.
More than one author:
Hesen, J., Carpenter, K., Moriber, H., & Milsop, A. (1983). Computers in the Business World. Hartford, CT: Capital Press.
An anthology or edited volume:
Schmoe, Joseph (Ed.). (1987). The History of It All: Historians on History. Chicago: Goingbroke Press.
An article from a journal: (Note: Do not use abbreviations "p." or "pp." )
Maddux, K. (1997, March). "True Stories of the Internet Patrol." NetGuide Magazine, 88-92.
Online article
"Monetary
Regulations of the Carolingians, 750-817." Retrieved
In a list of books the last name goes first. The books are listed alphabetically in order of the authors' last names. Books without an author are listed by the first word, excluding "the" and "a" in the title: Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary would go under "W". It looks better if you indent from the second line of each entry (a hanging indent). For more information see the pages in Webster's already mentioned.
Again
thanks to Dr. Edward M Hanlon at