InstructionsObjective: To determine the degree that a person likes working with tasks and other people.Time: 45 Minutes Instructions:
|
QuestionerBelow is a list of statements about leadership behavior. Read each one carefully, then, using the following scale, decide the extent to which it actually applies to you. For best results, answer as truthfully as possible. |
never sometimes always 0 1 2 3 4 5
|
Scoring SectionAfter completing the questioner, transfer your answers to the spaces below:
Matrix SectionPlot your final scores on the graph below by drawing a horizontal line from the approximate people score (vertical axis) to the right of the matrix, and drawing a vertical line from the approximate task score on the horizontal axis to the top of the matrix. Then, draw two lines from each dot until they intersect. The area of intersection is the leadership dimension that you operate out of.
|
NotesPeople and MissionSome may ask, "In order to get a perfect score I would have to max out statements 2 (Nothing is more important than accomplishing a goal or task) and 14 (Nothing is more important than building a great team), but this would be a paradox." One of the mottos of the U.S. Army is "People and mission first." That is, nothing is more important than accomplishing the mission and nothing is more important than looking out for the welfare of the people. A good leader can do both! Relationships With OthersFor statement 10 - "When correcting mistakes, I do not worry about jeopardizing relationships," some people might believe that a "people-person" would put a low score to this question. They might believe that a "people-oriented" person would not want to jeopardize a relationship. But, if a leader really cared about the person, would the relationship (being friends) be more important or would guiding the person on to the correct behavior be more important? Lets put it in a "leader-teacher" relationship - If you did not correct your learner's mistakes, would that make you a more "people" teacher? Probably not. Good leaders do what it takes to build and develop the people around them. The "relationship" is not what makes them tick...guiding others onto greatness is what a "people" leader is all about. This question helps to separate the "country club leaders" who want to be friends with everyone; the "impoverish leaders" who are afraid they might make waves; and the real "people leaders" who are more concerned with coaching others so that they benefit the team. That is, if the leader lets one of her peers continue with the incorrect behavior, does this help or hinder the other members of the team? It is best not to picture a "people" leader as a friend, but as a person who is concerned with the growth and welfare of others. Instead of presenting a manager with a dilemma of choosing one or the other alternative, it shows how a leader can simultaneously maximize both production oriented methods and those that are people orientated. Self AssessmentCan people assess themselves? For studies, see Learner and Self Ratings. A perfect score is a nine in both categories of People and Tasks. If you gave yourself a perfect score or close to it, you are being too easy on yourself -- you cannot learn if you to not take a Critical Reflection of yourself. ModelingFor more information on constructing models of this nature, see Modeling. |
Reliability and ValiditySince this survey is a training tool, it has not been formally checked for reliability or validity. However, since I have had a lot of feedback from various training classes, other trainers, and various sources, I feel that it is fairly accurate. If I did a formal reliability and validity analysis, I would probably have to charge for it. Please feel free to send me your feedback (donclark@nwlink.com). |
| Created January 27, 1998. Last update - February 24,
2002. Return to Leadership Training and Development Outline About donclark@nwlink.com http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/bm_model.html |